Hey Ravi, thanks for the suggestion. We actually have plans to improve the website as a whole.
I agree that Redmine has a very 1990s look to it, but if we do update the website we can probably keep it as a backend for dev-related information. Migrating that would be a lot of work I'm not sure is worth the effort. Bear with us, I know this has been an issue for a while now, but our outward appearance is actually very important for us. Cheers, Martin On 01/25/2016 06:57 AM, Ravi Sharan wrote: > Hi gr folks, > > I was thinking, if we can discuss on redesigning the existing GNU > Radio wiki or migrate the wiki another platform to make > it look more aesthetically pleasing, during the dev call this week. > What do you guys think about this ? > > My notes for the proposal : > > - Current wiki is good with loads of information, but lags a bit in > the user experience. > - Use Mk Docs[1] or Read the Docs[2] platform for the Wiki which look > better in the > appearance than the current Wiki. [1] is mobile friendly. > - [1] and [2] allows to edit the wiki/documentation using git and can > be hosted on Github. > - Currently, redmine offers issue tracker and few other small-time > goodies (like road map for example), which are not available on [1] > and [2]. > - Most of the users would want to browse the docs/wiki more often than > reporting bugs/requesting features(my assumption). So issue tracker > and the wiki can > be separated ? > - We have CGRAN which looks more better in appearance than the main GR > wiki itself. > > I would be looking forward for your response. > > References: > [1] Mk Docs - http://www.mkdocs.org/ > [2] Read the docs - https://readthedocs.org/ > > Thanks, > Ravi Sharan > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
