Thanks for your explanation! That's worth while looking into!

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Francisco Albani <
francisco.alb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From Matlab MM documentation [1]:
>
> "[...] Typically, the input signal is the output of a receive filter that
> is matched to the transmitting pulse shape. [...]"
>
> Assuming the MM Gnuradio implementation has the same hypothesis on the
> input signal (anybody can confirm this?), I deduced this block is usually
> misused when feed with a square signal, because it will take only one
> sample per symbol discarding the rest (with useful energy). You can put a
> Moving Average before for better results.
>
> This is one of the reason why the pfb_clock_recovery block is better, but
> unfortunately unfit for square signals [2]. I found even better results
> using a gaussian filter inside pfb_clock_recovery as the pseudo-matched
> filter to square pulses (with a proper bt value). (Obviously I can only
> guarantee this for the specific signal I worked with)
>
> [1]
> http://www.mathworks.com/help/comm/ref/muellermullertimingrecovery.html
> [2] See discussion: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/812
>
> 2015-07-30 16:03 GMT-03:00 Iluta V <iluta2...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi, Tom,
>>
>> Could you be more specific where exactly it is not "the right algorithm"?
>> We'd appreciate that and would correct that in own work as well, if
>> Security Research Assessment made a mistake here.
>>
>> I will be looking forward to your response,
>>
>> Iluta
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Tom Rondeau <t...@trondeau.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Iluta V <iluta2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Research paper CONVERTING RADIO SIGNALS TO DATA PACKETS (Examination of
>>>> Using GNU Radio Companion for Security Research and Assessment) deals with
>>>> Clock Recovery MM, I attached the paper, have a look at:
>>>>
>>>> 6.Section 6.Counting the Bits
>>>> 7.Analyzing Demodulated Data
>>>>
>>>> Both deal with Clock Recovery MM usage and has flowgraphs.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iluta
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's great, and I'm glad they got it to work for their application.
>>> Looks like they provide a good explanation of its use, too. Still, it's not
>>> the right algorithm.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Tom Rondeau <t...@trondeau.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Another point to keep in mind is that the M&M block isn't great in
>>>>> fading environments. It's really suboptimal in general. Look at the
>>>>> pfb_clock_recovery block, instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Camara <danielcam...@gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Klauss,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could also take a look at
>>>>>> https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/archives/2015/03/notes_on_m_m_clock_recovery/,
>>>>>> it helped me quite a bit!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Best regards...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Klaus,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the manual page for this block has a paper reference in it:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1digital_1_1clock__recovery__mm__ff.html#details
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30.07.2015 10:16, Klauss Wolfeinstein wrote:
>>>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I would like to find a proper documentation on MM algorithm block
>>>>>>> (paper
>>>>>>> > for example). Any ideas ?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thank you.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Regards.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>     Best regards...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                      Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to