Hi, Tom, Could you be more specific where exactly it is not "the right algorithm"? We'd appreciate that and would correct that in own work as well, if Security Research Assessment made a mistake here.
I will be looking forward to your response, Iluta On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Tom Rondeau <t...@trondeau.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Iluta V <iluta2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Research paper CONVERTING RADIO SIGNALS TO DATA PACKETS (Examination of >> Using GNU Radio Companion for Security Research and Assessment) deals with >> Clock Recovery MM, I attached the paper, have a look at: >> >> 6.Section 6.Counting the Bits >> 7.Analyzing Demodulated Data >> >> Both deal with Clock Recovery MM usage and has flowgraphs. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Iluta >> > > > That's great, and I'm glad they got it to work for their application. > Looks like they provide a good explanation of its use, too. Still, it's not > the right algorithm. > > > Tom > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Tom Rondeau <t...@trondeau.com> wrote: >> >>> Another point to keep in mind is that the M&M block isn't great in >>> fading environments. It's really suboptimal in general. Look at the >>> pfb_clock_recovery block, instead. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Camara <danielcam...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Klauss, >>>> >>>> You could also take a look at >>>> https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/archives/2015/03/notes_on_m_m_clock_recovery/, >>>> it helped me quite a bit! >>>> >>>> Best regards... >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Klaus, >>>>> >>>>> the manual page for this block has a paper reference in it: >>>>> >>>>> http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1digital_1_1clock__recovery__mm__ff.html#details >>>>> >>>>> M >>>>> >>>>> On 30.07.2015 10:16, Klauss Wolfeinstein wrote: >>>>> > Hello, >>>>> > >>>>> > I would like to find a proper documentation on MM algorithm block >>>>> (paper >>>>> > for example). Any ideas ? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thank you. >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards... >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
