Antonny, On 07/01/2015 03:08 PM, Antonny Caesar wrote: > Marcus, > > Yes! For now, the pass-through functionality is fine for me. I saw the > Power Squelch block but it doesn't have a "control input" to decide when > my signal will pass through. Well, the job of the power squelch *is* to figure out whether the signal should be passed through, based on the signal itself. > This signal can be a sine, square wave, etc, but I think it isn't > important, because if I have the Energy Detector working fine, it will > always do its function, right? Well, if that signal has energy (as defined by your Energy detector), yes, I guess. > The Detector can't decide according to the signal I want. The decision > is made according to the spectrum, that is, my vector (0 or 1). I don't understand. "The spectrum": What does this mean to you? Spectrum is usually used as a expression describing the wholeness of signals in a given frequency range. > Like a tap: I have a control(vector) and the water (my signal) goes down > according to the opening. The amount of water that goes down doesn't > need to "analyse the water", just the control (vector) and then, leave > the water pass. So the question is: Your control can be 0 or 1, right? (Please reply in-line)
Let's define: n_in = samples going into your "tap" n_out = samples coming out of your "tap" n_ctrl = control values going into your "tap" While the control is 0, do you a) want your samples coming out of the "tap" to be constant 0, meaning that n_in=n_out=n_ctr, OR b) want the samples to just be dropped, n_in = n_ctrl, n_in < n_out; c) you want your tap to just let samples through when control is 1, so that it behaves like a real water tap, holding water back, meaning that n_in = n_out > n_ctrl > Using a tap was my best explanation for now haha That's why I still ask you for a quick drawing :) Best regards, Marcus _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
