On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Richard Bell <richard.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> From what I remember, there shouldn't be a functional difference. The
> difference is the amount of feedback delay in the loop. You always need to
> make sure one delay exists in any feedback path you can take, to avoid race
> conditions. After that, you want to minimize the loop delay. The one
> accumulator with delay in the feedback path ensures stability. The other
> accumulator keeps the delay out of the feedback path because it minimizes
> the loop latency.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Rich
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>

Yep, thanks, Richard!

Tom




> On May 11, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Tom Rondeau <t...@trondeau.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:50 AM, <ruben.m...@swisscom.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been looking into the design details of the control-loop block. I
>> stumbled upon the blog post of Tom (
>> http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2011/8/13/control-loop-gain-values.html
>> with the derivation
>> https://static.squarespace.com/static/543ae9afe4b0c3b808d72acd/543aee1fe4b09162d0863397/543aee1fe4b09162d08633ac/1313345573084/control_loop_derivation.pdf)
>> and also this article from TI:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt169/slyt169.pdf.
>>
>> Now looking at the schematics of the control loop in Tom's post and the
>> TI article (figure 5), you notice a slight difference after the loop
>> filter. In the TI article, there is delay (z^-1) followed by an
>> accumulator. In the schematics of Tom's post, the delay block is directly
>> integrated in the loop. Can somebody comment on these differences?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ruben
>>
>
> Hi Ruben,
>
> This is a good question, and I don't want to let it drop. I just don't
> have a good answer for your right now. If I can find the time, I'll try to
> go through things more carefully to understand why there is the added
> delay. Just keeping the thread alive in case someone else can jump in and
> answer it.
>
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to