Can I trans/receive without Rational Resampler?
It distorts the signal too much :(


Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:12:27 +0400 от Nasi <nesaz...@mail.ru>:
>Thanks a lot! I will try them too...
>
>
>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) от Bogdan Diaconescu 
><b_diacone...@yahoo.com>:
>>
>>One thing I did once and worked are:
>>
>>1. Use a file sink instead of USRP when transmitting. Then, once the file is 
>>generated send the samples from file (opened in a file source) directly to 
>>USRP. That will need a good harddrive with at least 80MB/s read speed, a SSD 
>>will work probably. 
>>
>>2. Do the above but write the file int RAM like dd if=yourfile.bin 
>>of=/dev/ram0 - you may need to give root access. Then open /dev/ram0 in a 
>>file source and send it to USRP. This will consume you RAM and will 
>>potentiall lock your laptop if the .bin file is bigger than RAM size.
>>
>>But, indeed you probably need a better computer.
>>
>>Bogdan
>>
>>
>>
>>On Monday, March 31, 2014 6:59 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de> wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>I'm afraid you can't reduce needed sample rate for a fixed bandwidth.
>>
>>You need a stronger laptop. Often, plugging it into mains power helps.
>>
>>Marcus
>>
>>On 31.03.2014 17:52, Nasi wrote:
>>> ohhh, now I understand. It produces UUUU in the transmitter side -
>>> which probably means underflow with my laptop. Do you know how to
>>> decrease this power?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT) ?? Bogdan Diaconescu
>>> < b_diacone...@yahoo.com >:
>>>> For dvbt the bandwidth is around 9.14Msps so with the rational
>>>> resampler you need to set-up the USRP at 10Msps. 1Msps will not
>>>> work as only a part of the spectrum will be received.
>>>> 
>>>> Bogdan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 6:36 PM, Nasi < nesaz...@mail.ru >
>>>> wrote: Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> I am using collected data also as
>>> you say.
>>>> I am using sampling rate of 1 Mbps instead of 10 Mbps which must
>>>> be the same for static transmission. Isn't it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) ?? Bogdan Diaconescu
>>>> < b_diacone...@yahoo.com >: Hi, not having access to my setup for
>>>> now but for the beginning you could try recording the spectrum
>>>> with your USRP and then use the file source to decode the signal
>>>> offline. There is a script file apps/capture.sh that I usually
>>>> use to capture data. You may tweak it for your
 needs (frequency,
>>>> gain).
>>>> 
>>>> Sometimes it was reported that on old cpus the processing power
>>>> is not enough so that the result is an overflow (you directly see
>>>> a long OOO message in this case). Try to see if this is the
>>>> case.
>>>> 
>>>> One way to reduce the overhead is to run the receiving flow
>>>> directly from command
>>> line instead of gnuradio-companion (e.g. ./top_block > out.txt)
>>> after you have generated the flowgraph. The gnuradio-companion
>>> cannot cope with big amount of data when the blocks gets out a lot
>>> of text.
>>>> 
>>>> Bogdan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Monday,
 March 31, 2014 1:22 PM, Nasi < nesaz...@mail.ru >
>>>> wrote: Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I am using ubuntu 13.04, GNURADIO 3.7. I cannot transmit or
>>>> receive using two (USRPN200 + XCRV2450 d.board+VERT2450 antennas)
>>>> devices for DVB-T project. Here is the dvb-t project:
>>>>  https://github.com/BogdanDIA/gr-dvbt
>>>> 
>>>> It will be very helpful and appreciated if you help me. If
>>>> someone tested it or can do it, please let me know. As far as I
>>>> know someone tested it with N210 model.
>>>> 
>>>> I think this failure is due to high
 noise/interference or smt.
>>>> else. However I tested it already with all possible
>>>> configurations. I also attach my .grc files.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- NE _______________________________________________ 
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list  Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>  https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- NE
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>>> mailing list  Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>  https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>> 
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1
>>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -  http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTOZDPAAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtDWwIALcmUMVs7Rrx/WdFtqJ//Fxn
>>tzMvsVrDOKBu+5AnmmbVZ20dVulN2lcZ25vZScpFYKOAbe5TwRy2XTsFODHItGNF
>>dhmyOQNLVArDSSQuWTLSnMODKEUMCgU/sxyDtal0SVz6KuCSjjwP/exgaKHtNweU
>>tQid+PdH0JTZ/5iqvtQyHJhwy0rcl0RIK8ig0MXhoQG8IQVl2lKZXUtlOle1wMsC
>>w5oed0uop0d1J4bWDxC3oBRd6DfSCLx9avXtCHEFdgiAZSkFPva0XhJbimm3K8GP
>>V6qzH2S29eojRZYQHqlWxy8ISMG8SCr0Ii2joHv6iESCB9cgK1KkWrECMc0Ltvk=
>>=HjFO
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
>
>-- 
>NE


-- 
NE
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to