Thanks a lot! I will try them too...
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) от Bogdan Diaconescu 
<b_diacone...@yahoo.com>:
>
>One thing I did once and worked are:
>
>1. Use a file sink instead of USRP when transmitting. Then, once the file is 
>generated send the samples from file (opened in a file source) directly to 
>USRP. That will need a good harddrive with at least 80MB/s read speed, a SSD 
>will work probably. 
>
>2. Do the above but write the file int RAM like dd if=yourfile.bin 
>of=/dev/ram0 - you may need to give root access. Then open /dev/ram0 in a file 
>source and send it to USRP. This will consume you RAM and will potentiall lock 
>your laptop if the .bin file is bigger than RAM size.
>
>But, indeed you probably need a better computer.
>
>Bogdan
>
>
>
>On Monday, March 31, 2014 6:59 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I'm afraid you can't reduce needed sample rate for a fixed bandwidth.
>
>You need a stronger laptop. Often, plugging it into mains power helps.
>
>Marcus
>
>On 31.03.2014 17:52, Nasi wrote:
>> ohhh, now I understand. It produces UUUU in the transmitter side -
>> which probably means underflow with my laptop. Do you know how to
>> decrease this power?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT) ?? Bogdan Diaconescu
>> < b_diacone...@yahoo.com >:
>>> For dvbt the bandwidth is around 9.14Msps so with the rational
>>> resampler you need to set-up the USRP at 10Msps. 1Msps will not
>>> work as only a part of the spectrum will be received.
>>> 
>>> Bogdan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 6:36 PM, Nasi < nesaz...@mail.ru >
>>> wrote: Hi,
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> I am using collected data also as
>> you say.
>>> I am using sampling rate of 1 Mbps instead of 10 Mbps which must
>>> be the same for static transmission. Isn't it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) ?? Bogdan Diaconescu
>>> < b_diacone...@yahoo.com >: Hi, not having access to my setup for
>>> now but for the beginning you could try recording the spectrum
>>> with your USRP and then use the file source to decode the signal
>>> offline. There is a script file apps/capture.sh that I usually
>>> use to capture data. You may tweak it for your
 needs (frequency,
>>> gain).
>>> 
>>> Sometimes it was reported that on old cpus the processing power
>>> is not enough so that the result is an overflow (you directly see
>>> a long OOO message in this case). Try to see if this is the
>>> case.
>>> 
>>> One way to reduce the overhead is to run the receiving flow
>>> directly from command
>> line instead of gnuradio-companion (e.g. ./top_block > out.txt)
>> after you have generated the flowgraph. The gnuradio-companion
>> cannot cope with big amount of data when the blocks gets out a lot
>> of text.
>>> 
>>> Bogdan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Monday,
 March 31, 2014 1:22 PM, Nasi < nesaz...@mail.ru >
>>> wrote: Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I am using ubuntu 13.04, GNURADIO 3.7. I cannot transmit or
>>> receive using two (USRPN200 + XCRV2450 d.board+VERT2450 antennas)
>>> devices for DVB-T project. Here is the dvb-t project:
>>>  https://github.com/BogdanDIA/gr-dvbt
>>> 
>>> It will be very helpful and appreciated if you help me. If
>>> someone tested it or can do it, please let me know. As far as I
>>> know someone tested it with N210 model.
>>> 
>>> I think this failure is due to high
 noise/interference or smt.
>>> else. However I tested it already with all possible
>>> configurations. I also attach my .grc files.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- NE _______________________________________________ 
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list  Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>  https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- NE
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>> mailing list  Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>  https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> 
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -  http://www.enigmail.net/
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTOZDPAAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtDWwIALcmUMVs7Rrx/WdFtqJ//Fxn
>tzMvsVrDOKBu+5AnmmbVZ20dVulN2lcZ25vZScpFYKOAbe5TwRy2XTsFODHItGNF
>dhmyOQNLVArDSSQuWTLSnMODKEUMCgU/sxyDtal0SVz6KuCSjjwP/exgaKHtNweU
>tQid+PdH0JTZ/5iqvtQyHJhwy0rcl0RIK8ig0MXhoQG8IQVl2lKZXUtlOle1wMsC
>w5oed0uop0d1J4bWDxC3oBRd6DfSCLx9avXtCHEFdgiAZSkFPva0XhJbimm3K8GP
>V6qzH2S29eojRZYQHqlWxy8ISMG8SCr0Ii2joHv6iESCB9cgK1KkWrECMc0Ltvk=
>=HjFO
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>


-- 
NE
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to