Great thanks to all of you here and in melange! The content below is
updated according to the advises above: 1.More details in time
synchronization and burst extraction; 2.More details in using streamed tag
to get more stable frequency resetting; 3.More details in frequency
correlation; 4.A state machine is added;
5.The structure of flow graph is changed; 6.New deliverable list and
schedule; 7.More references.
8.Deleted the words of promising some tasks after GSoC.




2014-03-16 15:27 GMT+08:00 zhenhua han <hzhua...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> My proposal has been updated on github.
> The proposal has been changed a lot according to the comments on Melange.
>
> 1.The flow graph has been changed. A new architecture is designed.
> 2.A state machine is added which explains more details on GSM decoder.
> 3.The deliverable list has been changed.
> 4.The schedule has been changed according to the new architecture.
>
> Looking forward to further advises :)
>
> Best wishes,
> Zhenhua
>
> 2014-03-13 21:12 GMT+08:00 zhenhua han <hzhua...@gmail.com>:
>
> The figure in the previous mail is incorrect.
>> It is too weird that the ratio is so low and with narrow transition. And
>> the sample count is not match the FB.
>>
>> After some debugs, I found the reason. I got the sample data with GNU
>> Radio companion. When I execute the flow graph, it starts to write data
>> into the file before my RTL-SDR started. So there are lots of invalid
>> samples at the start.
>>
>> I have fixed this bug. Here is a correct (maybe :) ) figure. The sample
>> rate is 1.25M sps. The FCCH burst lasts about 700 samples which equals 0.56
>> ms. The duration of a standard FB is 0.57 ms. It seems correct.
>>
>> I have updated this part in my proposal. Sorry for my mistakes.[image:
>> 内嵌图片 1]
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Zhenhua
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-13 11:27 GMT+08:00 zhenhua han <hzhua...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Oh, I forgot to say. The data is sampled by a RTL-SDR.
>>>
>>> Zhenhua
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-13 11:25 GMT+08:00 zhenhua han <hzhua...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have implemented the algorithm in the paper for test and uploaded my
>>>> code to github.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/hzhua/gr-fchdetection
>>>>
>>>> The result given by the algorithm seems great.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a figure generated by my program which is the ratio of average
>>>> error power to input power. It is very low at frequency burst and high at
>>>> other bursts.
>>>> [image: 内嵌图片 1]
>>>> I have also added this part in my proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Zhenhua
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-03-11 21:41 GMT+08:00 Bogdan Diaconescu <b_diacone...@yahoo.com>:
>>>>
>>>>  I totally agree with Martin regarding PFB channelizer. The PFB for gsm
>>>>> will be also a good challenge for gnuradio in general as obtaining only a
>>>>> moderate number of channels(say 50) takes a lot of processing power and
>>>>> achieving realtime processing is not possible currently. Split per 
>>>>> thereads
>>>>> and VOLK should be taken in consideration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:30 PM, Martin Braun <
>>>>> martin.br...@ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>>   On 03/11/2014 11:14 AM, zhenhua han wrote:
>>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> > From: *zhenhua han* <hzhua...@gmail.com <mailto:hzhua...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> > Date: 2014-03-11 16:00 GMT+08:00
>>>>> > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Proposal for GSoC on gr-gsm
>>>>> > To: Bogdan Diaconescu <b_diacone...@yahoo.com
>>>>> > <mailto:b_diacone...@yahoo.com>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thank you, Bogdan. Your work is a great help in developing the
>>>>> channel
>>>>> > hopping part.
>>>>> > As there are only 14 weeks in GSoC, the schedule is a little tight.
>>>>> > However, I will continue working on this project after GSoC (if I am
>>>>> > selected). And Channel hopping will be the first task after I finish
>>>>> all
>>>>> > the tasks planned in GSoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should definitely check out the PFB channelization, though. For
>>>>> multi-ARFCN applications, this will always be a requirement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to