I totally agree with Martin regarding PFB channelizer. The PFB for gsm will be
also a good challenge for gnuradio in general as obtaining only a moderate
number of channels(say 50) takes a lot of processing power and achieving
realtime processing is not possible currently. Split per thereads and VOLK
should be taken in consideration.
Bogdan
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:30 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com> wrote:
On 03/11/2014 11:14 AM, zhenhua han wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *zhenhua han* <hzhua...@gmail.com <mailto:hzhua...@gmail.com>>
> Date: 2014-03-11 16:00 GMT+08:00
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Proposal for GSoC on gr-gsm
> To: Bogdan Diaconescu <b_diacone...@yahoo.com
> <mailto:b_diacone...@yahoo.com>>
>
>
> Thank you, Bogdan. Your work is a great help in developing the channel
> hopping part.
> As there are only 14 weeks in GSoC,
the schedule is a little tight.
> However, I will continue working on this project after GSoC (if I am
> selected). And Channel hopping will be the first task after I finish all
> the tasks planned in GSoC.
You should definitely check out the PFB channelization, though. For
multi-ARFCN applications, this will always be a requirement.
M
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
