Has there been any progress on this bug? Would this effect performance enough to cause The under run uUuUuU at 250k sample rate on a beaglebone black (1ghz arm v7- nothing running)?
On Sunday, December 15, 2013, Tom Tsou wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Tom Rondeau > <t...@trondeau.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Monahan-Mitchell, Tim > >> OK, good to hear. Does that mean bugs 582 and 583 should be re-opened? > > > > I've reopened the tickets as "Works for some". Philip, Nathan, and I > > agreed to work together this week to try to resolve it seeing as how > > Philip can replicate the problems. > > Just another data point. Similar results here with native A15 build on > Linaro 13.11. > > $ make test > Running tests... > Test project /tmp/gnuradio/build > Start 1: qa_volk_test_all > 1/1 Test #1: qa_volk_test_all .................***Failed 1.88 sec > > 0% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 1 > > Total Test time (real) = 1.94 sec > > The following tests FAILED: > 1 - qa_volk_test_all (Failed) > Errors while running CTest > make: *** [test] Error 8 > > -TT > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <javascript:;> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
