Vlad

It is apparent to me that you did not understand Josh's explanation.
 Possibly he was not forceful enough. ;-).

This is not an error.  It is the mathematical consequence of doing QAM with
rotational symmetries.  YOU MUST provide your OWN synchronization to remove
the phase ambiguity.  It is not a bug or an error. It is a feature.  It is
the mathematical nature of the beast.

Bob


On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Vlad Stoianovici <
stoianovici_v...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Dear list and Josh,
> I'm still getting this error when using the QAM Demod block (qamX_demod is
> not connected internally).
> Are there any new developments concerning these blocks?
>
> Vlad.
>
>
> Josh Blum-2 wrote:
> >
> > Well, when you receive a qam signal, and lock to it, you still have some
> > unknown phase offset. Lets suppose qam8 has two possible phases: 0 and
> > 180 degrees. Since you don't know which phase is correct, you can look
> > for the packet header in the received signal at 0 degrees and
> > simultaneously at 180 degrees. Whichever phase offset yields a valid
> > packet is the winner. Of course, this all assumes that you are framing
> > your data with some kind of packet headers.
> >
> > Anyone else have some qam demodulation ideas to share?
> >
> > -josh
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/QAM-demod-Error-in-GRC-tp23722153p31655276.html
> Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>



-- 
Bob McGwier
rwmcgw...@gmail.com
Amateur Radio Station: N4HY
Engineer, Mathematician (Ph.D Brown University)
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to