Sorry I made a mistake, I used the wrong fpga-build and firmware when I ran the vrt branch. When I discovered my mistake I downloaded the files from http://www.ettus.com/usrp2_vrt but I cannot get the USRP2 to work with these files. The leds go on just as normal, but when I try to run ./find_usrps I just get "No USRP2 found". Does anyone know where to get the proper image files for the fpga and firmware?
Regards, /Ulrika > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ulrika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org > [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ulrika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org] > On Behalf Of Ulrika Uppman > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:48 AM > To: Per Zetterberg > Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value > > Hi, > I have now tried both the git master and the vrt branch and > the results there are similar to those in the 3.2 version. > > I was guessing that the timestamps would be generated/handled > differently in the vrt branch but at a first glance I didn't > see any major differences in the code. What is the difference > with regard to timestamps and timing when using the vrt branch? > > Regards, > /Ulrika > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Per Zetterberg [mailto:per.zetterb...@ee.kth.se] > > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:16 PM > > To: Ulrika Uppman > > Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value > > > > >> > > >> Do anyone know why the difference in timestamp value > > between received > > >> packets is so big? What am I missing here? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> /Ulrika > > > > Have you tried the vrt branch by jblum ? > > > > BR/ > > Per > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
