Ulrika Uppman wrote:
Oops, the printuts seems to have been mosched together in the mail, here is
that part once again:
ts_in = 1435221596, ts_last = 0, diff = 1435221596
ts_in = 2560802396, ts_last = 1435221596, diff = 1125580800
ts_in = 3367616092, ts_last = 2560802396, diff = 806813696
ts_in = 4174429788, ts_last = 3367616092, diff = 806813696
ts_in = 686341724, ts_last = 4174429788, diff = 806879232
ts_in = 1493155420, ts_last = 686341724, diff = 806813696
ts_in = 2283192156, ts_last = 1493155420, diff = 790036736
ts_in = 3090005852, ts_last = 2283192156, diff = 806813696
ts_in = 3896819548, ts_last = 3090005852, diff = 806813696
ts_in = 408731484, ts_last = 3896819548, diff = 806879232
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ulrika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ulrika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Ulrika Uppman
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:10 PM
To: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Timestamp value
Hi,
I wonder how the timestamps are being generated for each
ethernet-packet sent from the USRP2 to the host? My initial
idea about how it works was that timestamps are generated at
100MHz (same as the samples) and then the timestamp
associated with the first sample in an ethernet data packet
will be put in the metadata which could then be unpacked in
the host. I then would assume that the next packet after the
first one will have a timestamp value that is proportional to
the number of samples per packet times the decimation rate.
However I get timestamp values that increase much much more
for each received packet, so I wonder if my idea of how
timestamps are generated is wrong?
I run the stable 3.2 version of gnuradio on Ubuntu 9.04 and I
have an USRP2 with the RFX2400. (I also was going to try the
gnuradio trunk but I got problems with building, see my other
post "Error on make from git development trunk"). I tried
both an old version of the fpga bin-file and one that I just
recently downloaded (but both gave the same result).
I put some printouts in usrp2_impl.cc in the
handle_data_packet function and the output when I run
rx_streaming_samples then looks like this:
./rx_streaming_samples -f 2457e6 -d 16 -N 400 -v
..............................................................
.....................
Daughterboard configuration:
baseband_freq=2456250000.000000
ddc_freq=-750000.000000
residual_freq=-0.016764
inverted=no
USRP2 using decimation rate of 16
Receiving 400 samples
ts_in = 1435221596, ts_last = 0, diff = 1435221596 ts_in =
2560802396, ts_last = 1435221596, diff = 1125580800 ts_in =
3367616092, ts_last = 2560802396, diff = 806813696 ts_in =
4174429788, ts_last = 3367616092, diff = 806813696 ts_in =
686341724, ts_last = 4174429788, diff = 806879232 ts_in =
1493155420, ts_last = 686341724, diff = 806813696 ts_in =
2283192156, ts_last = 1493155420, diff = 790036736 ts_in =
3090005852, ts_last = 2283192156, diff = 806813696 ts_in =
3896819548, ts_last = 3090005852, diff = 806813696 ts_in =
408731484, ts_last = 3896819548, diff = 806879232
Copy handler called 2 times.
Copy handler called with 2968 bytes.
Elapsed time was 0.000 seconds.
Packet rate was 100000 pkts/sec.
Approximate throughput was 148.40 MB/sec.
Total instances of overruns was 0.
Total missing frames was 0.
..............................................................
.....................
ts_in is the timestamp found in the metadata of the packet
just received, ts_last is the one from previous packet and
diff is just the difference them between. Since there seems
to be no missing frames I'm guessing the big value of diff
can't be related to lost packets?
If I try different decimation rates, I see no obvious
relation between the difference in value between two timestamps...
Do anyone know why the difference in timestamp value between
received packets is so big? What am I missing here?
Thanks,
/Ulrika
e
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Have you tried the vrt branch by jblum ?
BR/
Per
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
