pity on you,
                please read the way matt (dignified way) has responded. i
expected a certain level of dignity in mails. Please make out my mail in
such a dignified manner. This is not a complaint in first place..a
query..Till date i have 6 patents issued on mimo and smartAntennas ...and
you are teaching me..where to do business..

john


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Bob McGwier <rwmcgw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great.
>
> Sit in front of your keyboard and during the time you wrote this complaint
> you could have made a start on the code.  If you need to build flavors of
> MIMO and you cannot even make this beginning yourself,  you are in the wrong
> end of this business.
>
> This is a user contributed project.  Matt sells hardware.  Users write the
> code.  If you cannot do that and you simply want a code monkey to do your
> work, I suggest you contact Jonathan Coulton or hire a contractor or work on
> it yourself QUIETLY.
>
>
> Bob McGwier
>
>
> john boon wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>       i haven't had any reply till now on "MIMO with USRP". its very
>> unfortunate that big people like eric,jonathan and even matt didn't reply to
>> my query. A Board like USRP which started way back in 2005 (usrp1..which is
>> mimo capable according to ieee spectrum 2006 ), still dont have any
>> reference code for MIMO. sorry to say, this is really slow pace..work. I
>> Understand I NEED to write and make  a way out  and for that one has to go
>> through mails lists archives. But my investigation requires me to test
>> different flavours of MIMO, i would have been happy if there is some working
>> code on which I NEED TO BUILD MANY FLAVOURS of MIMO without really breaking
>> down my head over writing hardware related configurations program. Forget
>> about C++, i dont think any python reference code exists for MIMO. having so
>> many standards like wimax and LTE which have MIMO implementations, i think
>> gnuradio forum people should seriously think about MIMO implementations.
>> Anyway..no way..out i have started writing code..but i still stand on the
>> word.."this is not the way you support for open source hardware ----> this
>> is to hardware manufacturers"
>>
>> thanks
>> john
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT,
> AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
> NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
> "You don't need to see the whole staircase, just
> take the first step.", MLK.
> Twitter:rwmcgwier
> Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to