On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean that your code can't go in the repo, or that Orange can't > go in the repo? I see no problem having code in the repo use Orange. You're describing an approach to the dev branches -- here and below -- that's considerably more liberal than my previous understanding of it, anyway. Good. > In general, no one should be expecting code in a dev branch to be > fully sorted out, or for that matter, even compile. Got *that* part down, thanks :-) > It seems obvious there has to be a place for GNU Radio code that's GPL but > > will not be assigned to FSF, with certainty. I believe there should also > be > > a place for code whose status is *uncertain* -- in short, a place with > > minimal obstacles to publishing early and often. > > I believe that's one of the CGRAN goals. The understanding, then, is that it's explicitly OK for non-FSF-assigned code to go into dev branches of the official repo. That's news to me, and I'm glad to have it cleared up. Frank -- I have taken the stand that nobody can be always wrong, but it does seem to me that I have approximated so highly that I am nothing short of a negative genius. -- Charles Fort
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
