On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Frank Brickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If what you want is to get your fingers into the software, assemble your own > soft radios, you definitely, positively, absolutely want to use GNU Radio as > the software backend. That's one of the things it's for and it does the job > wonderfully. Once you get the hang you can put together a new application in > minutes. I myself am right now in the process of developing some new > features for DttSP and am prototyping them all in GNU Radio first. > > A decent soundcard is a must, though.
I'm pretty sure GNUradio is the way I want to go then. You, and others on this list-thread, seem to suggest the sr40 can indeed be used with GNUradio, iff you have a decent sound card. ... am I reading that right? I'm just trying to get my feet wet on the subject, so the $8 - $50 pricetag is easier to swallow than $700-$1400. I'm assuming there's a huge amount of limitations with the sr40 over the USRP, but it can be used successfully. That's interesting. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Stan Slonkosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramakrishnan, VU3RDD, in March 2006, said he had made a crude first > version of a demodulator for the softrock. See > http://www.zerobeat.in/gnuradio/sr40 . Everything about the sr40 seems "crude" but it's interesting to note that I wouldn't even have to start from scratch. -- If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming. 107 jumps, 43.5 minutes of freefall, 83.4 freefall miles. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio