On Friday, March 08, 2013 20:16:13 Rob T wrote: > If you know of a better way to implement an exception handler in > D, then I'd like to know about it. For example I do know that D's > system allows you to insert callback functions, but I don't yet > know how to make use out of it, so perhaps there's a better way.
If all you need to do is do something when an exception is thrown and don't need the exception itself, then just use scope statements: http://dlang.org/statement.html#ScopeGuardStatement scope(failure) doSomethingOnException(); //code that might throw The block inside the scope statement will run when the surrounding scope is exited with an exception. That _really_ cleans up a lot of code that just wants to react to the fact that an exception was thrown and not actually do anything with it. - Jonathan M Davis
