On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 03:29:21 UTC, Peter Summerland
wrote:
I don't think Jonathan was (merely) dismissing readable
terseness and saving typing. IMO he had more pertinent reasons
why
foreach(i; 0 .. 5)
{}
is very nice, *as is*.
The only thing I'd want to be able to do is:
//----
foreach ( ; 0 .. 5)
{
writeln("hello");
}
//----
If I don't need a named variable, why force me to define a symbol?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9009
I know I could just use "i" and move on, but when code starts
getting complex, and you already have i, j, k, ii, dummy etc...,
it can make a difference.
