On 01/09/2013 10:08 AM, ixid wrote:
>> for (i; ++j) {
>> /* ... */
>> }
>>
>> Did I forget something or is it "from zero to the incremented value of
>> j"?
>
> If this was supposed to be a normal for loop
> the user's forgotten to give i a type and a boundary condition and the
> second semi-colon, that's three errors, the space of different
> behaviours you can get to in any given piece of code by making three
> errors is probably quite high.
I think the name 'i' would make one think that there has been three
mistakes. (I admit that I chose it that way. ;) ) In fact, there was a
single mistake: a forgotten semicolon (and a space that comes with it
for readability):
for (; i; ++j) {
/* ... */
}
Ali
