Robert Clipsham wrote: > After reading TSalm's post, I reran the D version with the scope keyword > at line 16: > > D (with scope): 1.098s > D: 6.282s > C++: 4.435s > > It seems by using scope and tango you can easily compete with C++.
'scope' eliminates dynamic memory allocation. At this point you're not measuring the speed of the garbage collector at all. For a fair comparison, you should also eliminate the useless dynamic memory allocation from the C++ version. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
