Robert Clipsham wrote:
After porting the D version to tango:
D: 6.282s (ldmd -O5 -inline -release -L-s -singleobj gctest.d)
C++: 4.435s (g++ -O5 gctest.d)
This is on a C2D 2.2Ghz, 2GB RAM, Linux x86-64. I don't have java
installed, so can't test that. Maybe if you're planning to use the GC a
lot you should consider using tango?
After reading TSalm's post, I reran the D version with the scope keyword
at line 16:
D (with scope): 1.098s
D: 6.282s
C++: 4.435s
It seems by using scope and tango you can easily compete with C++.
