On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le Thu, Jun 27, 2002, à 12:10:35PM +0100, Andrew Ferrier a écrit: > >> OK. Have to admit I was being a bit selfish in that I have yet >> to run 'make dist' successfully --- just wanted to see what it >> did! Maybe I should figure out how to check out 0.90 Gold from >> anon. CVS... > > Something like > cvs co -r DIA_0_90 dia > >> That said, yes, if nobody ever runs it, problems won't get >> noticed... > > That's very true. It is valuable to know that there are "make dist" > problems; however, it is important as well to know that the problem is in > the dist part of the makefiles, as opposed to the simple "build" part. > > I noticed mat's comment on automake1.5; also, I noticed that sid includes > automake1.5 and automake 1.6. > > Lars: we have to decide something: > - we figure out how the old app/Makefile.am did to have a > conditional gnome-print renderer without tripping up "make dist"
This is what we want. AFAIR, we need to define XSLT_LIBS, XSLT_PLUGIN etc depending on the --enable. > or > > - we include libxslt unconditionally Not good. We would at least want to stabilize the plugin and see if it's something that many people want. > or > > - we mandate automake 1.5 or more. Not until those 'issues' are sorted out. Funny thing is, I got that error message on both my machines when the XSLT plugin arrived without using make dist, but I just did a second make and it was happy. I am using automake 1.4. -Lars
-- Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |---------------------------- will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?
