On 2002-06-27 at 11:58 +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Try to stick with simply "make" -- this will yield the > executable. "make dist" is to generate tarballs... > > (though periodically running "make distcheck" and "make dist" > and reporting on the results *is* helpful -- but separately > running a simple "make" and a simple "make --recon install" > help classify the problems between construction and > packaging)
OK. Have to admit I was being a bit selfish in that I have yet to run 'make dist' successfully --- just wanted to see what it did! Maybe I should figure out how to check out 0.90 Gold from anon. CVS... That said, yes, if nobody ever runs it, problems won't get noticed... Progress is slow on my coding at the mo. BTW, glad I picked something as trivial as author name printing to start ;) It's not all the C that's the problem, it's all this automake/autoconf/build/CVS/argh... Regards, Andrew. -- Andrew Ferrier email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.new-destiny.co.uk/andrew/ _______________________________________________ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
