On 03/01/2017 10:57 AM, Anton Kolesov wrote: >> That means for building of our toolchain we'll need to have separately stored >> "defconfigs" in some form. Let's see what Anton says on that :)
But why is that - as long as buildroot (or other build systems) pass the right cpu flags - why do you need a seperate config ? >> And regardless of what mr Anton says having off-the-tree defconfigs is not >> the best idea because with time options will go in and out and occasionally >> we'll have outdated defconfigs. The whole out-of-tree defconfig approach is nonsense - lets not discuss it ! > [AK] Not specifying architecture via uClibc config file is good for me - I > wanted this long ago, since I never understood why current approach was used > in > the first place. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
