On 03/01/2017 10:25 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> That was >> a fair requirement on their part but it kept bloating uClibc for our typical >> embedded use. But this idea of minimal vs. full featured is exactly what we >> need. >> @Alexey / @vlad can we take this up please ! > Probably Waldemar's opinion might be useful here. > @Waldemar are there any plans for busting arch-specific defconfigs in favor > to generic defconfigs like those "minimal" and "full" mentioned above?
I didn't read Thomas' proposal that way. IMHO it would be better to stage it by first folding arch defconfigs into arch min/full and later if possible merge them in arch independent min/full ? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
