On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 14:09, Hal Murray via devel wrote: > I think we should put the current stuff on the back burner and make a new SHM > interface where the clients are read only. > > Is shmget/shmat the right API to use? I remember discussions of there being > a > wrong API but don't remember any details.
I always liked the idea of moving to a shm or a local socket "clockd" interface. (Under the hood, a UNIX domain socket or a 127/8 localhost socket is nothing more than merely a shm segment and two semiphore locks.) A clockd interface was, in fact, part of the original plan. Maybe make it the plan again? ..m _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
