On 2/2/19 3:06 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: >> >> We have a min option. > As previously discussed her. A min options was tried by others in the > past, and failed. When SSL 2 gave way to TLS 1, the min broke.
Huh? What's the problem here? The epoch in renumbering from SSL 2 & 3 to TLS 1.0? At this point, a minimum TLS version seems perfectly reasonable. So is a list of versions, but a minimum is simpler. -- Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
