Yo Achim! On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 10:43:33 +0100 Achim Gratz via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> Hal Murray via devel writes:
> >> You might be right, but I'm not going to design on the assumption
> >> that you are because the payoff matrix is too asymmetrical.
> >
> > Just because the current pool is untrustworthy doesn't mean that
> > somebody couldn't run a trusted pool.
>
> No, in fact my expectation is that the ntpsec implementation should
> support an NTS pool.
Which does not exist, and will take years for an RFC to create.
> > Keep in mind that pool+nts isn't well specified yet.
>
> I agree, but it's specified well enough to work.
Ah, no. Use the current pool with NTS and you blow away all the advantages
of NTS. Don't go there.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpViQOkecu77.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
