Yo Eric! On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 12:34:34 -0500 "Eric S. Raymond via devel" <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote:
> If there's a good semantic reason to have a separate nts statement, I
> can do that.
The options for the 'nts' and 'server' statements in the config file
will be different. Trying to merge them will confuse everyone.
Right now, server looks like this:
server address [key key] [burst] [iburst] [version version]
[minpoll minpoll] [maxpoll maxpoll]
nts looks like this (not well decided or documented yet):
nts address [[ask address]|[require address]] [noval]] [burst] [iburst]
[prefer] [minpoll minpoll] [maxpoll maxpoll]
I suspect some more options will be needed for the nts.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpNg1LELZEKV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
