On 2/1/19 9:19 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > Having a separate nts config statement would have required admins to > enter the name of a server to which secure connection is intended > twice, once in the server declaration and once in the nts declaration. > This was suboptimal design, inviting subtle configuration bugs due to > typos.
I don't know what was in nts.adoc, but the proposal on the list was certainly that NTS associations used _only_ nts, not server + nts. -- Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
