Achim Gratz via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> Eric S. Raymond via devel writes:
> > Gary E. Miller via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> >> Next virtual meeting of the NTP WG is Feb 12. Maybe we should get some
> >> of these issues on their agenda?
> >
> > If there's another revision in process, I want to object to the binary
> > request format. Raises endianness issues for no good reason. Better to use
> > something like Motorola S-records for this.
>
> You could at least try something that has better coding efficiency?
> Here's something that works with plausible implementation languages,
> including Go:
>
> https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/overview
Still not textual.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
