On 01/04/2018 08:39 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: > Cool. So you are unaffected by the original issue. Since you do not > have the issue, I assume you'd prefer that no unneeded kludges be added > when you build NTPsec. So why do you care how the issue gets solved?
I don't think being personally affected by a bug is a prerequisite to providing patches. Can you provide a merge request with your proposed solution? -- Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
