On 08/08/2017 11:16 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Thank you, that is correct procedure. Acting in Mark's absence I concur; we'll slip it if you don't have it done. Mark has the privilege to override this decision but I will be quite surprised if he does.
Well now I'm increasing this to Official /Strong/ Suggestion: the packet.py testing project just got moved to the top of the list because of bug #341. And IIRC the code in packet.py is entangled with the comm channels in ways that may require a significant test jig, or refactor. Either way AgentX got plonked onto the backburner.
Your priorities should be, in this order, (1) Any NTPsec tracker issues you can close, (2) Any deadline-sensitive work you are seconded to on other projects, (3) AgentX. Just tell us when it's done.
Got it (see above). -- In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power? No. A Man Chooses, a Slave Obeys. -- Andrew Ryan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
