Sorry I missed the meeting. I understand why distro maintainers wouldn't want pre-1.0 code. I thought that you would release 1.0 both as the usual source repo _and_ with "example" packages. I would expect that the maintainers might well repackage to suit their tastes.
On 08/07/2017 03:59 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: > Yo Eric! > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 15:51:13 -0400 > "Eric S. Raymond via devel" <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > >> John D. Bell <j...@systemsartisans.com>: >>> I thought that one necessity before 1.0 were at least preliminary >>> "packaged" version for the major distros - i.e., .deb and .rpm >>> files, conformant to the conventions (file locations, etc.) of the >>> systems that used them. >>> >>> Am I wrong? If not, do you know what the status of these are? >> This came up at the staff meeting; unexpectedly, Mark was there. The >> only packaging he seems to consider must-have is Debian. > And we have a chicken and egg thing with the distro maintainers, they do > not want to work with a pre-1.0 version. > > RGDS > GARY > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? > "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- - *John D. Bell*
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
