Yo Eric! On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:55:06 -0500 "Eric S. Raymond" <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
> > I think we want something like ntp_time32_t and ntp_time64_t.
> >
> > I'm looking for something that will tell the reader that it's a
> > seconds since NTP epoch, parallel but different from a POSIX
> > time_t.
>
> Reasonable. If you eantee to create and speread around, say,
> ntp_secs32_t and ntp_secs64_t, I would not object.
So now we get a 96 bit l_fp?
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpwEtS5OYlYX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
