Yo Hal! On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:44:29 -0800 Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> POSIX has time_t
> ntp_types.h has time64_t
>
> There are various places that are working with seconds since NTP
> epoch. They are using uint32_t and uint64_t.
>
> I think we want something like ntp_time32_t and ntp_time64_t.
Or, just go with the flow and use the epoch in a timepec like
structure:
ntp_time_t {
int epoch;
uint32 seconds;
uint32 faction;
}
That would stop all that shifting back and forth.
We need timespec for getting and setting the system clock, some
similar keep s my brain fro having to shift as much.
It will be less important as we get rid of more things using l_fp for
no good reason.
> I think we will also want come better names/aliases for things like
> lfpuint
Yeah. x and y make sense when typing at 100 baud, but not now.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpjh2pRD0dFZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
