Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
>
> [extension fields]
> > That sounds uncomfortably plausible. I can think of a workaround: add a
> > padding extension long enough that the packet can't have any of the magic
> > lengths.
>
> Here is the RFC on that area.
>
> Network Time Protocol Version 4 (NTPv4) Extension Fields
> March 2016
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7822
I've read that. I've even implemented it myself once, in the Python protocol
back end. Is there advice in there that I missed on how to avoid magic-length
interactions?
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
