fr...@nicholasfamilycentral.com said: > Would refclockd be a part of NTP? If so, Iâd be ok with that. I just have > no need for GPSd on a pure time server.
I use "refclockd" as a tag to describe a great cleanup. I haven't seen a serious proposal so there aren't any details to discuss. Moving the code that understands refclocks to a separate address space should improve security. > How portable is âSHMâ? Is it covered everywhere NTPSec wants to go? Is > GPSd portable to everywhere NTPSec wants to go? (Iâm asking, not arguing - I > donât know the answers). Any cleanup to the SHM area should set things up so that the reader side doesn't need write access. That allows multiple readers so you can use monitoring tools while ntpd is running. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
