Slava, thank you for this constructive suggestion. I submitted PR https://github.com/sailfish-sdk/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/pull/86 to add sqlite into the list of allowed libraries. Hopefully, it will be accepted.
Best wishes, Rinigus On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Slava Monich <slava.mon...@jolla.com> wrote: > I believe rpm automatically detects the dependencies, even if they are not > in the spec. Removing the dependency from the spec might not help. There > may be some hackish ways of removing a dependency from the rpm headers but > I don't think that it would be a good idea. Better to spend time on hacking > something more useful than that. > > Another approach is to load the library with dlopen, e.g. > > https://github.com/monich/harbour-books/blob/master/app/stubs/libmagic.c > > This allows you to get around the harbour limitations and yet in every > other respect it's as good as linking with the system library. Of course by > doing so you assume the risk of using the unsupported api. Obviously, this > kind of trick should only be done to very stable libraries that are > extremely unlikely to disappear from the system and have a proven track > record of evolving in a backward compatible manner. > > I think the best solution is to add sqlite3 to allowed_libraries.conf and > submit a pull request: > > https://github.com/sailfish-sdk/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/ > blob/master/allowed_libraries.conf > > Cheers, > > -Slava > > >> Is the automatic checker not allowing it through with sqlite3 as a >> requirement? Are you sure that you used the packagename used on jolla >> systems for the requirement? >> > > During deployment as RPM, the specific error is > > Requires > > ======== > > ERROR [libsqlite3.so.0] Cannot require shared library: 'libsqlite3.so.0' > > INFO [harbour-osmscout-server] Please see our FAQ here: > <https://harbour.jolla.com/faq#2.6.0>https://harbour.jolla.com/faq#2.6.0 > how to use '__provides_exclude_from' and '__requires_exclude' .spec file to > avoid that > > FAILED > > > earlier versions of this app were published in the store without any > issues. Its a part of the app evolution to require sqlite3 for its > function, at least for a time being. > > I agree that static linking of sqlite3 is not necessary and can be > considered as a bloat. Hence my question :) > > rinigus > > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. > sailfishos.org >
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
