On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:56 AM Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:58:01AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:20:24AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > systemd is in a similar position as us, where they can't really break > > > compatibility because too much stuff is built on top, so they just > > > use an ever-increasing version number. Simple and effective. Why > > > can't we do the same? > > > > Note systemd is not strictly single digit - their stable releases have > > an extra digit. > > And we could do the same. >
I will also point out that systemd switched to an integer specifically so they could break everything all the time. The libsystemd library is not intended to be considered stable. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
