On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de>
wrote:

> On Thu, 17.12.15 10:02, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 08:28 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > I would question why its necessecary to keep systemd out so ardently.
> If you
> > > build your container layers properly, you can effectively put systemd
> in a base
> > > container and layer other applications in child containers that
> inherit from it.
> >
> > If one is doing "micro" containers that only have typically one process
> in them,
> > having systemd managing it is unnecessary overhead.
>
> Can you give realistic examples for these? Can you explain what you
> are intend to run as PID 1 in them instead? What is cleaning up /tmp
> for those things? What is setting up the tmpfiles bits in /run for
> them, and so on?
>

The recommendation for docker containers is to only have one process, when
it dies, the whole container stops, this is how to manage a cluster and
know when something die.

Mustafa


> Lennart
>
> --
> Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to