On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 17.12.15 10:02, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 08:28 AM, Neil Horman wrote: > > > > > > I would question why its necessecary to keep systemd out so ardently. > If you > > > build your container layers properly, you can effectively put systemd > in a base > > > container and layer other applications in child containers that > inherit from it. > > > > If one is doing "micro" containers that only have typically one process > in them, > > having systemd managing it is unnecessary overhead. > > Can you give realistic examples for these? Can you explain what you > are intend to run as PID 1 in them instead? What is cleaning up /tmp > for those things? What is setting up the tmpfiles bits in /run for > them, and so on? > The recommendation for docker containers is to only have one process, when it dies, the whole container stops, this is how to manage a cluster and know when something die. Mustafa > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org