On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 08:28 AM, Neil Horman wrote: > > I would question why its necessecary to keep systemd out so ardently. If you > build your container layers properly, you can effectively put systemd in a > base > container and layer other applications in child containers that inherit from > it.
If one is doing "micro" containers that only have typically one process in them, having systemd managing it is unnecessary overhead. There are some outstanding issues with this model; need a way to tell a pid namespace to auto-reap children in the kernel so pid 1 doesn't have to know to do that. But we should also obviously support systemd-in-container as a lot of people are in a middle phase of "virt lite" with containers. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
