On 29 November 2015 at 21:53, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:
> On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 14:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 +0000 > > James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything > > > jumped out as interesting when I saw this: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 > > You have one mini review [1] say fixed and next comment say package > request has been approved. Don't forget now packages requests are > made directly with pkgdb [2] , so I think you are overreact , > especially if you look for emails. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422#c2 > [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ > > What mini review? Comment 2 is fixing up the links so that fedora-review should be able to work not carrying out a review... Package requests are carried out in pkgdb yes (no more cvs flags!) but we still use the fedora-review flag to indicate when something is being reviewed and if it is approved, and the assignee is the person reviewing. I'm pretty sure I didn't overreact as there is no sign of any review taking place.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
