Am 23.10.2015 um 04:37 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the confirmation the package not only works for youSorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as relevant* for the decision whether to push the update as the presence or absence of reported issues. (That said, Bodhi rules are such that a generic +1 often *is* important because otherwise Bodhi won't let me push the update at all.) (In addition, a more precise statement what exactly was tested is also more useful than a generic "works for me", but I realize it can be hard to state this without wasting hours writing novels for many packages.)
frankly i use fedora-easy-karma and updates-testing over years enabled and a "works for me" is what it says - nothing is appearently broken
even if a update says it fixes a specific bug which never affected me "works for me" means no regressions for my daily workload and so if it improves something for other users -> push it out, it don't harm me
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
