Reindl Harald wrote:
> it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the
> confirmation the package not only works for you
Sorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as
relevant* for the decision whether to push the update as the presence or
absence of reported issues. (That said, Bodhi rules are such that a generic
+1 often *is* important because otherwise Bodhi won't let me push the update
at all.)
(In addition, a more precise statement what exactly was tested is also more
useful than a generic "works for me", but I realize it can be hard to state
this without wasting hours writing novels for many packages.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
