On Thu, 7 May 2015 08:58:45 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, just as mentioned in the previous thread, if you do things > > this way it means every user of any unison will have to get a > > useless update everytime any version of unison in your combined > > package updates for any reason. Thats pretty disruptive. > > I think the issue is that none of those versions are getting updates > anymore. They are dead code... any fix that is going to be in one is > probably going to be in all of them so they would all need it. I mean that anytime you say add a new version to it, or fix some minor packaging issue in just one, _EVERYONE_ with _ANY_ version will then get the update (even though it actually changes nothing on their system). ie, you have: unison package that ships all of Unison 2.13.16, 2.27.57, 2.40.128 Users install the one they need/want to use. you add 2.48.3 and all those users of the other 3 will get an update with 0 changes. I don't think just adding new packages is that big a deal to save everyone from this. kevin
pgp8eSDKoj3X1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
