On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Vít Ondruch wrote: >> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making >> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build >> dependencies, etc. > > -1, all the serious software requires gcc, gcc-c++ and make to build. > > I actually think that cmake should be added to the minimal build root, > instead of removing stuff. Almost all the packages I work on BuildRequire > cmake (which also implies that they need make to build, and gcc-c++ is the > typical implementation language).
Yes good idea. I worked on Java packages. Let's put Maven in minimal buildroot. I am sure everyone will enjoy it. Sorry for the sarcasm. Couldn't resist :-) Seriously though what's a problem with listing your package's real build requires? -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@redhat.com> Business System Analyst, Hosted and Shared Services (HSS) PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
