On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Designing an application for the lowest common denominator does not > give you a high-quality cohesive application that's easy to use and > nice on the eye. It gives you a miss-mash of ugly noise that's hard to > use. I think it's fine that we are essentially saying "you have to do > X, Y, Z to be showcased on the workstation". I've essentially slipped > into the role of the person making the decisions about the software > installer on the workstation product, and also upstream maintainer of > most of this stuff. If anybody wants to refer any of my decisions up > to the workstation working group, I'd be happy to talk to them, but > I've a feeling they would be *less* forgiving than I'm currently > being. > I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from a Software manager, because they don't live up to some visual quality guidelines. It don't benfit the endusers, if the software manager only shows 50% of the gui applications in the Fedora repositories. What about not showing the icons if they dont have the need size, just show a default icon based on the application category they you have both the good look and a lot of applications. Tim
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
