On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in > maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email > addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others > can take them over. > Hi all, wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a new owner? I mean this should be pretty easy to implement in a company, or? All the best, Johannes > > If you have a way to contact any of these maintainers, please let them > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages. > Thanks! > > Maintainers: > > * jpacner - former email address jpac...@redhat.com > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/jpacner > Point of contact: 0 > Co-maintainer: 5 > Watched: 0 > > * dajt - former email address fenla...@redhat.com > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/dajt > Point of contact: 6 > Co-maintainer: 3 > Watched: 0 > > If we don't hear anything in a week, we will be removing their acls and > will need to find new point of contacts, etc. > > Thanks, > > kevin > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
