2014-04-24 18:13 GMT+02:00 Casey Dahlin <cdah...@redhat.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn <lnyk...@redhat.com>:
> >
> > > We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every
> > > service uses a systemd unit, so this part does not have to be
> installed by
> > > default, but could be pulled in as a dependency.
> > >
> >
> > Are you sure? If you take an existing RPM that ships a sysv file, that's
> > alone an indication that it probably hasn't been significantly reworked,
> so
> > noone is likely to have added an explicit requires: on "this part". For
> > extra credit, make sure that this works correctly with LSB-compliant RPMs
> > that do nothing not required by LSB.
> >
>
> I may be wrong but I believe we could update our dependency-detection
> scripts
> to note when a package ships an init script and add the requirement
> automatically. As long as there's a mass rebuild between now and shipping
> that
> should take care of everyone.
>
Only those that are maintained directly inside Fedora.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
